Topic: Re: Writing 'WB Compatible Builder', questions about WinBuilder language  (Read 165 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CD-RW

  • Moderator, LiveSystem pro
  • Jr. Chef
  • *****
  • Date Registered: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 56
Its a nice discussion.

WB and LSP are platforms for the development of PE projects.
When the development began in 2011, the goal was to develop a 100% builder.
During this development, I had to realize that many things at the WB are solved very badly.
Much is chaotic and it makes no sense at all to make the same crap again.
That is why I decided to go a better way.
The goal is to make simple scripts.

If you compare the WB and LSP projects, think it has succeeded.
Look at the WB scripts, they are Mega-Librarys.

WB Projectsize 4 * 200 MB
LSP Projectsize 16 MB

The Problem, even if "Ied206" program a new builder, the scripts remain the old.
 
Whom we now generally talk about the WB and the LSP syntax, if there would be better.
Of course, you could save it all.
You do not need to develop a new parser.
It would be enough to use an open source code in the Au3 format.
Autoit has everything you need to create a PE.

Kare
--


Re: Writing 'WB Compatible Builder', questions about WinBuilder language
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2017, 10:19:59 PM »

Lancelot

  • Gena Baker
  • Grand Chef
  • *****
  • Date Registered: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 7012
If you compare the WB and LSP projects, think it has succeeded.
Look at the WB scripts, they are Mega-Librarys.

WB Projectsize 4 * 200 MB
LSP Projectsize 16 MB

Hi Kare,

Since you copy projects here on code level, you already know projects here includes packages ready to be used out of box.
Flash is 20 MB
FireFox 71 MB
etc....
And you pretend not to know, and compare and say wb mega library....
Come on...

Your builder-project not containing such packages is your decision.
Success is you own your builder-project that is all.

and lsp can not support wb syntax is not about wb code written bad,
 it is because you could not design and code lsp that way.
  Well it is your words you wrote me when you start coding lsp.
  Now Today You like to excuse lsp inabilities with wb known bugs
    Come on.....


I can write more comments to your Spam Advertisement post, I do not have time, Enough is enough.



*
We suffer from Spam Advertisements in the past,
 Where winbuilder developers jump to topics to advertise their projects,
   with bended logic kind of advertisement,
    The exact way you do here.
     Time proves someone who codes a builder with project jump to topics to spam advertise.   :lol:
      Now same as winbuilder developer psc, LSP developer Kare - CR-RW jumps to spam advertise after 8 years.....

One of reasons we open forum is to suffer from such stupid childish activity we faced more than 8 years ago.

We first open LSP section for your project and builder here,
http://theoven.org/index.php?board=23.0
we support your project this way, we do not tolerate childish activites.
Play Fair at TheOven.


Current topic is not about lsp wb compare, it is ied206 designing wb compatible builder.

So Kare, stop such thing, NEVER Again.
 I do NOT tolerate Spam Advertisements  :horse:
  Next time you will be banned.


2 posts here
http://theoven.org/index.php?topic=2082.0
Writing 'WB Compatible Builder', questions about WinBuilder language
will be moved to LSP section..
http://theoven.org/index.php?board=23.0


:turtle:

Re: Writing 'WB Compatible Builder', questions about WinBuilder language
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2017, 05:36:56 AM »

CD-RW

  • Moderator, LiveSystem pro
  • Jr. Chef
  • *****
  • Date Registered: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 56
Ok   :smile: Lancelot we are old friends, near 10 years.
One should not forget that

Kare
--

 

Powered by EzPortal